Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Linda Shopes's avatar

I believe it is questionable that Miss Gray "did not testify that she was raped." According to the Baltimore County Union of 23 May 1885, she did in fact accuse him at his trial: "Miss Gray positively identified him [Cooper] as the man who had assaulted her. . . . She gave her testimony in a subdued voice, but very intelligently, and her lady-like appearance and demeanor at once excited the sympathies of all present." Another account chose not to record her testimony in deference to her "sensibilities." Of course, one might reasonably question what is meant by "assault" in this instance: an attack but not a rape (which is what Cooper was reported as admitting to)? a rape?; and it is possible that Gray lied - anyi-lynching activist Ida B. Wells certainly argued, with evidence, that white women lied about consensual relationships/relations with Black men when discovered. Though what constitutes "consent" might also be questioned. Alternatively, was Cooper framed as a troublesome youth? In my view, we'll never fully know what happened. Which, of course, is moot: lynching, whatever the circumstances, is a heinous crime, committed with impunity.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?